Problems with TM Research Listed below are excerpts from articles, books and other studies which analyze the problems with research conducted by the TM Organization. These problems include allegations of suppression of negative evidence, of fraud and of "gross scientific incompetence", lack of double-blind controls, refusal to submit raw data, failure to control for set effects, failure to control for expectancy of relief, failure to control for placebo/suggestible-prone subjects, and others. Article entitled, "Problems with TM Research" , by Professor of Sociology, Barry Markovsky. Excerpts: Asymmetry #3: Who Conducts the Research and Who Pays For It? "Who sponsors research on TM? Mostly the TM organization. Who conducts research on TM? Almost exclusively researchers having a tremendous vested interest--material, psychological, professional and social--in the outcomes of their research. "Historically, this state of affairs has proven to be a recipe for biased results. [Suggested reading: "Betrayers of the Truth" by William Broad and Nicholas Wade--although they over-generalize their observations to all of science.] Bringing us back to the first point, how many TM researchers would you guess have conducted studies making a serious effort to detect and characterize negative effects of TM? How much money would you guess the TM organization has invested in such research? How many grant proposals to external funding sources for carrying out such research would you guess TM researchers have submitted?" "The best method of testing hypotheses, however, is to try your hardest to disprove them--not merely to verify them. If they survive the most stringent of tests, you can be that much more confident in their validity. So what if TM researchers never seek to disprove their claims but only to verify them?" "The thing is, much of the TM research is very non-controversial, and the much smaller volume of potentially controversial stuff that has been published is tucked away in 3rd-rate journals (or worse). So the TM organization can point to the publications and say 'Look, we're published in prestigious, main-stream scientific journals!' Most scientists are not interested in trying to counter such hype in the court of public opinion, and most are not interested in following up the breathless claims of TM research because--quite contrary to the way the TM propaganda machine portrays things--the more controversial TM research is widely ignored (even among consciousness researchers who you would expect to be very sympathetic), and the bulk of the rest is pretty mundane from the perspective of journal readers." Peer review analysis of the "Maharishi Effect", Evaluating Heterodox Theories . Markovsky, Barry and Fales, Evan. The University of North Carolina Press. Published December 1997 in Social Forces Volume 76 (2):511-25 Note to text: [12] A re-analysis of the data also would have been desirable, though not essential for our case. However, David Orme-Johnson has refused numerous requests for a copy of the raw data set. Letter from Dr. Dennis Roark , former MIU Dean of Faculty and head of Physics Department, to Pat Ryan in Philadelphia, PA. From TM-EX Newsletter, Spring 1992 Excerpts: "During my time at MIU, I had occasion to examine the scientific claims of the movement, to interact with those who had reportedly performed the research, to study the metaphysics, philosophy and religion associated with the TM technique, and to work with the founder of the movement and the college. It is my certain belief that the many scientific claims both to factual evidences of unique, beneficial effects of TM and to theoretical relationships between the experience of TM and physics are not only without any reasonable basis, but are in fact in many ways fraudulent." "Confirmed to me by investigators at MIU was the suppression of negative evidence that these investigators had collected. Strong bias was present in selecting only data favourable to a conclusion that was made prior to the data collection. Because of the strong authoritarian (essentially cultic) aspects of the movement, only results supporting ideas generated by the movement leadership could receive any hearing. The 'scientific research' is without objectivity and is at times simply untrue." Sworn affirmation from Attorney Anthony D. DeNaro , former Professor of Economics and Business Law and Director of Grants Administration at MIU. July 16, 1986. Presented to Judge Gasch of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia as part of Kropinsky civil suit, #85-2848. Excerpts: "9. The deliberate pattern and practice of fraud, deceit and misrepresentation by knowledgeable, aware, educated and intelligent people, including lawyers, Tarabilda and Druker in tax (IRS) matters, corruption of the curricula, inter alia, is very pertinent and material to understanding and gaining some insight into how and why the practices of the defendants was able to continue without interruption for so long. It also suggests why they are seeking to cover-up a very substantial and injurious pattern of deception, fraud and corruption: "They demonstrate, for example, that: "d) Scienter [informed or guilty knowledge] was clearly present in the frauds, but was justified in the name of a higher ideology, which presumably means they can lie, come into a federal court, and commit perjury; "e) More significantly, an understanding of their wilful deceits and machinations in these areas, provides a useful insight and perspective into the more serious areas resulting in psychological and physical injury to very vulnerable, and easily manipulated young men and women; "f) If it can be demonstrated that the zealous, and often fanatical, educated people, including lawyers associated with the TM cult, are willing, even eager, to engage in an active, deliberate, systematic pattern and practice of major fraud involving hundreds of millions of dollars against the federal government, it might reasonably be inferred that they are willing to deceive and injure (if necessary) innocent and very vulnerable private citizens, i.e., young students;" "11. I have read an affidavit consisting of one and a half pages, sworn and subscribed to by Professor John W. Patterson on June 30, 1986, and agree with his observations and conclusions. "At para 3, page 1, Professor Patterson suggests more than 'gross scientific incompetence' is involved and believes the misrepresentations are the result of 'dishonesty, deliberate deceit and fraud.' I agree unequivocally." "12. The deceptions are intricate, fairly sophisticated, intentional, and are mainly designed to sell or market TM. ..." Affidavit of John W. Patterson , member of the Iowa Academy of Sciences and consultant to Committee for the Scientific Investigation of claims of the Paranormal. Notarized June 30, 1986 in the state of Iowa. Excerpts: "Many of the claims issued by the TM organization in their news releases and recruitment campaigns are not just badly mistaken and ill-conceived; they are worse. No competent scientist, on the basis of present scientific understanding, could seriously subscribe to the TM views. Mass meditation cannot be used to lessen the force of gravity, to effect levitation, to modify weather patterns, or to lessen social and economic stresses in distant places. Religious believers often hold such views, but only for religious reasons - never on the basis of scientific findings. There is no compelling evidence to suggest that natural forces exist which are capable of such "actions through a distance" and indeed the law of the conservation of energy implies such things are impossible. If no educated scientists were among the leadership of the TM movement or on the faculty at MIU, one could write such absurd claims off to mere incompetence. However, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi professes to hold a degree in physics and there have been at least two Ph.D. holders in the MIU Physics Department alone over the years. This, along with other considerations, causes me to rule out the charges of gross scientific incompetence and opt instead for the charges of dishonesty, deliberate deceit and or fraud." "Much of the research reported by MIU involves elaborate procedures but also involves what might be called 'cleverly poor' experimental controls and a great deal of unjustified 'leaping' to favorable conclusions. Herein lies another source of circumstantial evidence for the fraud or deliberate deceit mentioned above. Were the experimental mistakes and errors of judgment due mainly to naivete or mere incompetence, one would find about as many unfavorable results as favorable ones as regards the alleged benefits of TM and the so-called Sidhi and "Maharishi" effect(s). But one finds nothing of the sort. In virtually all their reports, the results tend to to never be negative, but are almost always cited as "statistically significant" confirmations of their hypotheses. So one-sided is the tally, in fact, that one may justifiably question the honesty if not the competence of the TM researchers." Book by Persinger, Michael A, Norman J. Carrey and Lynn A. Suess. TM and Cult Mania (198 pages). North Quincy, Massachusetts: Christopher Publishing House, 1980. "Claims of the TM effects are neither unique nor special but are the consequences of procedures associated with suggestion, placebo reactions, simple relaxation, neurotic belief, and the mislabeling of vauge emotional experiences. In this book we investigate the precise psychological and social procedures by which this movement manipulates human behavior." p.7 Chapter 3. "Flaws in the TM Experiments: A Critical Evaluation" Failure to Control for Set Effects Failure to Control for Expectancy of Relief Failure to Control for Placebo/Suggestible-Prone Subjects TM is not a Unique State of Consciousness The Mantra Is an Aritifact No Comparitors Solicited Testimonials The Fasces Method or "Drown 'Em With Data Approach" No Direct Verification The Biased Experimenter Chapter 5. "The TM Sell Job" Proof by Numbers Proof by Affirmation The Einstein Sanction Proof by Television Proof by Lack of Disproof TM Teachers: Portrait of Pseudotherapists The Maharishi: Manipulator of Images Article entitled, "In the Name of Science" , by A. Miller. From TM-EX Newsletter, Spring 1991 Excerpts: "They declare these studies to be scientific proof of TM's plethoric physiological and behavioral benefits. That's the hook. You won't hear at the TM lecture that the studies they quote from are performed by TM movement people or by people they sponsor (at Maharishi International University and at other universities) without using double-blind (1) or expectancy controls. Since 1973 when MIU was founded, it has been in the TM movement's direct interest to create and then flaunt this selfserving research to support increasing claims for the efficacy of TM practice and their 'ideal' SCI (2) educational system, to attract meditating proselytes, to recruit students for MIU, to enhance belief among followers and to promote Maharishi's world government and international Vedalands, his enlightenment enterprises, services and products worth $3.5 billion plus, and his plans for a quantum leap in new sales and influence (3)." "Aside from outright fraud charged by two former MIU faculty members (4,5), such non-controlled TM studies are proven to be influenced by the tendency a priori to confirm the researcher's indoctrinated belief in TM (expectancy). Conversely, the motivation of subjects being tested who began TM on their own (pre-selection), plus the movement's subsequent influencing of those subjects to expect benefits from TM (placebo)--each of these phenomenon in a tightly controlled research study by Jonathan Smith has been proven to produce by itself the observed benefits and not the practice of TM per se (6)." "Suppressed by the TM movement are many carefully controlled nonmovement research studies that have uncovered the following actual effects from TM, especially from its long-term practice or from its more intense daily use, called rounding: 1. No specific or broad scale special benefits. 2. Partially impaired mental faculties. 3. Depersonalization. 4. Loss of self-determination and motivation. 5. A high percentage of psychological disorders. 6. Adverse effects in social relationships. 7. Aggravation of pre-existing mental illness." 1-Double-blind denotes a comparative research experiment in which the identities of the control group are known neither to the subjects nor to the researchers. 2-The Science of Creative Intelligence, TM's philosophy. 3-David Friend, The Return of Mr. Bliss. LIFE magazine, November 1990, pp. 82.92. 4-Anthony D. Denaro, counsellor at law. Affidavit - equivalent (12 pages) Sea Cliff, NY: July 16, 1986. Former MIU legal counsel and professor of law and economics, and former MIU Director of Grants Administration. 5-Dennis E. Roark, Letter to Pat Ryan: Confirming a conversation of July 11, 1987 (2 pages). Physics Department head, Warner Pacific College, Oregon. (Dr. Roark was former head of the MIU Physics Department and former MIU Dean of Faculty.) 6-A ten page listing of such research, abstracted and with related subject documtation is available from TM-EX. Recent example of faulty TMO research methodology, from Enlightenment Maharishi Vedic Science and Technology, Sept 2000; page 13, article entitled "Opening the Door to Life". Excerpts: "Jackie and 34 others are learning the TM technique as part of a study examining its effects on cancer patients' longevity and quality of life." "...The only glitch in implementing the study came when we created the control group -- people who wouldn't be learning the TM technique. In the face of overwhelming scientific evidence that TM would improve their mental and physical health, not one person was willing to be part of the control group!"   [Home]